2025 SPWLA Annual Symposium Presentation / Poster Judging

Criteria: The following criteria are to be used for selecting the best oral presentation and best poster presentation.

The final score for a presentation or poster will use the following marking scheme: 75% Presentation (50% Presentation Quality, 25% Technical) / 25% Quality of Paper

Reviewer *

Please type your name here

Paper *SPWLA-2025-0001SPWLA-2025-0002SPWLA-2025-0003SPWLA-2025-0004SPWLA-2025-0005SPWLA-2025-0006SPWLA-2025-0007SPWLA-2025-0008SPWLA-2025-0009SPWLA-2025-0010SPWLA-2025-0011SPWLA-2025-0012SPWLA-2025-0013SPWLA-2025-0014SPWLA-2025-0015SPWLA-2025-0016SPWLA-2025-0017SPWLA-2025-0018SPWLA-2025-0019SPWLA-2025-0020SPWLA-2025-0021SPWLA-2025-0022SPWLA-2025-0023SPWLA-2025-0024SPWLA-2025-0025SPWLA-2025-0026SPWLA-2025-0027SPWLA-2025-0028SPWLA-2025-0029SPWLA-2025-0030SPWLA-2025-0031SPWLA-2025-0032SPWLA-2025-0033SPWLA-2025-0034SPWLA-2025-0035SPWLA-2025-0036SPWLA-2025-0037SPWLA-2025-0038SPWLA-2025-0039SPWLA-2025-0040SPWLA-2025-0041SPWLA-2025-0042SPWLA-2025-0043SPWLA-2025-0044SPWLA-2025-0045SPWLA-2025-0046SPWLA-2025-0047SPWLA-2025-0048SPWLA-2025-0049SPWLA-2025-0050SPWLA-2025-0051SPWLA-2025-0052SPWLA-2025-0053SPWLA-2025-0054SPWLA-2025-0055SPWLA-2025-0056SPWLA-2025-0057SPWLA-2025-0058SPWLA-2025-0059SPWLA-2025-0060SPWLA-2025-0061SPWLA-2025-0062SPWLA-2025-0063SPWLA-2025-0064SPWLA-2025-0065SPWLA-2025-0066SPWLA-2025-0067SPWLA-2025-0068SPWLA-2025-0069SPWLA-2025-0070SPWLA-2025-0071SPWLA-2025-0072SPWLA-2025-0073SPWLA-2025-0074SPWLA-2025-0075SPWLA-2025-0076SPWLA-2025-0077SPWLA-2025-0078SPWLA-2025-0079SPWLA-2025-0080SPWLA-2025-0081SPWLA-2025-0082SPWLA-2025-0083SPWLA-2025-0084SPWLA-2025-0085SPWLA-2025-0086SPWLA-2025-0087SPWLA-2025-0088SPWLA-2025-0089SPWLA-2025-0090SPWLA-2025-0091SPWLA-2025-0092SPWLA-2025-0093SPWLA-2025-0094SPWLA-2025-0095SPWLA-2025-0096SPWLA-2025-0097SPWLA-2025-0098SPWLA-2025-0099SPWLA-2025-0100SPWLA-2025-0101SPWLA-2025-0102SPWLA-2025-0103SPWLA-2025-0104SPWLA-2025-0105SPWLA-2025-0106SPWLA-2025-0107SPWLA-2025-0108SPWLA-2025-0109SPWLA-2025-0110SPWLA-2025-0111SPWLA-2025-0112SPWLA-2025-0113SPWLA-2025-0114SPWLA-2025-0115SPWLA-2025-0116SPWLA-2025-0117SPWLA-2025-0118SPWLA-2025-0119SPWLA-2025-0120SPWLA-2025-0121SPWLA-2025-0122SPWLA-2025-0123SPWLA-2025-0124SPWLA-2025-0125SPWLA-2025-0126SPWLA-2025-0127SPWLA-2025-0128SPWLA-2025-0129SPWLA-2025-0130SPWLA-2025-0131SPWLA-2025-0132SPWLA-2025-0133SPWLA-2025-0134SPWLA-2025-0135SPWLA-2025-0136SPWLA-2025-0137SPWLA-2025-0138SPWLA-2025-0139SPWLA-2025-0140SPWLA-2025-0141SPWLA-2025-0142

Please identify the presentation you are reviewing.

Judge Team *Session ChairTechnology CommitteeSymposium Attendee

Please indicate whether you are a Session Chair for this paper, a member of the Technology Committee or an Attendee at the Symposium.

Presentation / Poster Structure and Presentation

Please rank the presentation selected using the star system below.

Clear outline of Objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Organization, logical progression, well-prepared *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Delivery & effective communication *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Summary and Conclusions concise and logical *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Clear/readable text, equations and figures *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material stimulates audience involvement *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Good time management *YesNo

Presentation time with time for Q&A

Not overly commercial *YesNo

Oral and visual

Technical Component

Please rank the presentation selected using the star system below.

Does it support sound processes and methods of proof *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

i.e. Technically sound.

Develops a new concept and/or expand previous concepts with new findings or techniques *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

This can include outstanding case studies

Does concept have broader applicability outside the presented study? *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Would you recommend this paper? *YesNo

Quality of writing & documentation of the Paper

For SESSION CHAIR / CO-CHAIR ONLY

Follows prescribed SPWLA paper guidelines

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Has clear and easy-to-follow structure

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Tables and figures are easy to read and adequately captioned

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

i.e. including scales, legends and headings

Well-referenced and has complete references provided

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Would you consider this paper as a contender for best of the symposium? *NoMaybeYes

Any comments?

Submission...

When you have completed your ranking of this presentation or poster please click the Submit button below. If it fails to send then it's likely that one or more required fields have not been completed. Please attend to and resubmit.

Submit